lwj supremacist

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
buried-in-stardust
buried-in-stardust

I swiped across an SVSSS edit that went viral and just had to share some of the comments under it lmao:

image
image
image

*Mo Dao = MDZS, Tian Guan = TGCF, Zha Fan = SVSSS

image
image
image
image

*yuandan (原耽) refers to original danmei, danmei being BL (boy's love)

(The novel names MDZS and SVSSS also sound very much like stereotypical novels aimed at men)

[eng by me]

buried-in-stardust

image

Is this common??? I saw two comments saying they/someone they knew had thought Lan Wangji was a woman dressed as a man until near the end. Then they were like 'wait, this doesn't seem right...'

mdzs sksjdkdkkd
grewlikefancyflowers
kimalysong

image

Okay there has been some talk about official and unofficial versions of MDZS in its original language.

MDZS was never fully published in print in Simplified Chinese. Only the first volume sadly came out and then the release was cancelled. I do own a copy of this. Though I bought it second hand from Japan so cannot verify if it is official. My copy here is unopened but it’s extremely short so would only cover the very beginning of the story.

Otherwise the only official full version of MDZS that exists in print came out in Traditional Chinese uncensored in Taiwan. The box set you can see in the picture is this official version from Pinsin.


Since MDZS is locked on JJWXC I don’t think it’s possible to verify you have the full official simplified Chinese version from an Online version.

Seven Seas did make mistakes and I have many issues with their translation but they translated off the official Pinsin release. What they translated off is the only existing full and uncensored version of the story.

if you are unsure of something ask someone to show you a physical page from the Pinsin version of the novel to verify.

kimalysong

Okay so actually I own two versions of Wuji. Why two? Because the first version I received was not in the best condition. I ended up finding another version that was sealed and brand new.

I had to dig through my storage bins to find my opened version but just to confirm the Wuji version of the novel only covers up to the end of the Yi City arc right before the second drunk scene in Allure.

As a bonus it also included the Yunmeng/Lotus Pod Extra. I am including some more photos for reference.

image
image
image
image
image
image
image
image
raining-bluebells

? what are people saying, i haven’t seen anything

mdzs
mondengel
saltwaffle

full offense but none of you would have ever survived fanfiction.net in 2009

jetru

remember when writers had to be all like:
“omg omg lemon starts HERE”

y’all are lucky that ao3 has tags and filters you can set

domicileensnared

Sometimes shit was marked “lemon” and it’d just be them making out, and sometimes they’d just start pissing on each other

No rules, no laws, you took your life into your hands opening fics

frostyemma

A/N: this contains SLASH, that means TWO MEN, if that makes you uncomfy, DON’T READ!

A/N: please don’t sue me, o anime overlords, I’m not making any money off of this! I’m just a broke student! I don’t have any money!

A/N: I totally wrote this while high off 10 Red Bulls wheeeeeee!!!!!

A/N: COMMENT if you want me to continue the next chappy!!!

raimagnolia

No, no, no


remember when there’d be interactions with the author and the characters?

InuYasha: I don’t get why I have to be here for this

A/N: Because it was in your contract!!1!1 *revs chainsaw*

janekfan

god those were lawless times. 

the-apocryphal-one

image
prismatic-bell

“Flames will be fed to my dog!”

mariposakitten

Anonymous asked:

Some people on my dash are posting a screencap of u apparently defending race play and problematic kink and calling u names, the screen cap includes zero content about that it cuts off after a sentence but whats going on. I'm on mobile i really dont feel like scrolling back 4 weeks on your blog to see whole context plus i have a fckin headache but why are they saying this and what is the context. im anon so weird people dont harrass me for not going along with ooc screenshots 🙄

genderkoolaid answered:

The post in reference is here.

Me “defending raceplay” is saying that some people of color are going to be into raceplay, and we have to be comfortable with that and not stigmatize marginalized people for having a “problematic” sexuality. Because that’s how you get marginalized people getting harassment campaigns for not having Morally Pure Kinks, and that does nothing to actually help them but it does create a new way to control how they are allowed to engage with their sexuality instead of respecting their autonomy.

If you can’t respect a person of color who gets off on raceplay, if you view them as less an [ethnicity] or less capable of being an activist or shame them etc etc That Isn’t Helping POC! And it also gives actual racists (and transphobes, homophobes, misogynists, fatphobes etc.) more fuel, because if someone is exposed as having one of these Bad Kinks and all their leftist friends shame them, then they are left perfectly vulnerable to be torn to shreds by bigots who will blow it up and make it a huge “Cringe Leftist Actually Gets Off On Bad Thing!”. But if their leftist friends say “yeah, and?” to that expose, it can have less of an impact AND you don’t have a marginalized person left vulnerable to harassment.

Basically. If the left doesn’t get over its fucking kink-phobia then bigots will forever be able to use that shit to target marginalized people and leftist will help them because they genuinely think that having Bad Sex Thoughts is a sin akin to murder. So we have to not care. You have to be able to look at a kinkster and not judge them for the kink.

mariposakitten

We as a species have GOT to come to terms with the fact that sometimes the things that tickle your nethers are not even passing acquaintances with your normal real-life thoughts and beliefs and morals, and that's okay.

I have kinks y'all would never ever guess, that the people who know me best in the world, that my spouse would never ever guess. (No, I'm not gonna say what they are, ya perverts, mind your business.) I've had the unenviable experience of having to keep a straight face when a friend loudly refused to explain a kink that I have to me, under the assumption that I was too innocent to know about such things. Because you can't tell. Because the things that get your juices flowing in bed have no bearing on how kind or good or inclusive or whatever a person you are in real life. Because the most unproblematic saintlike person you know could very well have some DARK NASTY KINKS and you would never fucking know, because your kinks do not define you!

It's just another version of thoughtcrime. Worry about how someone treats real, actual people, not what they fantasize about when they jack off.

strinak
thedreadvampy

kind of wish I could get hype about communes as a concept but the thing is I think there's a huge blind spot around specifically power dynamics, agency and accountability which gets lost in utopian thinking

which is to say that yes in an ideal world a commune would have solid accountability and protections in place to tackle abuse and coercion

but we very much don't live in an ideal world and time and again I keep seeing people both in communal living situations and in less full-on activist and organising communities just sort of. plough on in the assumption that a) nobody in their community will be abusive and b) they'll Figure It Out if it does happen, they have all the Good Transformative Justice ideas and knowledge and resources!

Keep reading

grison-in-space

For the record, this is a great summation of why I'm not an anarchist: because fundamentally, I think the best way to balance the conflicting needs of safety and connection is to have external structures that can be totally separate from our personal and communal chosen bonds. If you give that impersonal structure the power to enforce a common law, you end up reinventing a state. It doesn't have to be a capitalist state--personally, I like socialism--but you do end up there if you remove the element of choice. Sometimes certain things need to not be optional, like whether someone who leaves a community is entitled to their financial share, or whether we take care of people who are so broken that they become wildly unpleasant to interact with.

Thing is, you don't need malice to create an abusive situation. You don't need to construct a narcissist or a person who is always an abuser or even someone who doesn't love the person they're hurting. Conflicts, deeply dysfunctional situations, and abuse happen even in well meaning groups of generally altruistic, honest individuals, especially when people are operating beyond their individual thresholds in terms of the physical, cognitive, and emotional labor that they are trying to provide.

In particular, it is extremely common for people with complex trauma to feel that they are valuable only insofar as they can provide valuable labor to the community so they aren't easily replaceable, which generally winds up making them load-bearing community members... load-bearing community members who are relatively prone to meltdowns if they split or burn out. Which is common: if you think your only value is your labor, you can't withdraw that labor if you run into your reserves or you lose your community, so burnout with this particular pathology is quite high...

(I'm talking about me, by the way, and maybe a dozen other people I know, with varying levels of self awareness and determination to Not Do That. It's a common, common sort of person, especially in circles that care sincerely about building a more just world. It's not always a story that ends badly, but the rails are there.)

You cannot select these issues out of your community by only letting the right people in. They will pop up, no matter what you do. Even if you can magically make sure that everyone in your community is 100% honest and sincere and intends the best, you will find yourself in these situations. At these times, what matters is what you do about it--and as with any emergency, what you do when it gets real bad is strongly influenced by what you do when things are only a little bad.

strinak
haunthouse

image

thanks @bmoharrisbankofficial but unfortunately i can’t focus on the very important message here because i’m too busy being confused by the fact that apparently if you send an ask with only one letter tumblr will bold that letter in the “asked you” notification text?? why the fuck would that be the case

haunthouse

image

fascinating

triviallytrue

what the fuck is the backend of this site like

this would be frontend but yeah ??????
enekorre
moonlarked

this site really hates people with ocd

moonlarked

“reblog this or you don’t support minorities!” “if you don’t reblog this then all of your followers should hate you!” “if you have a bad thought then you actually think that way and you’re a horrible person!” “you can only like ‘good’ things and if you like something ‘bad’ then you’re awful!” i am going to throttle you with my bare hands

grewlikefancyflowers
mortalityplays

the way people on here talk about the porn ban makes me completely fucking insane honestly.

  • yes I would love a return to the old ways.
  • no that isn't something staff have control over, it's a systemic issue with puritanical groups intentionally strangling online infrastructure to make adult content impossible to platform.
  • no that doesn't mean the ban was value neutral and I will fucking kill you with my mind if you start going on about how 'it just meant all the annoying people left'
  • sex workers left, and so did the high spending customers who made tumblr a viable platform for a lot of other small creators
  • a lot of sex educators and queer outreach groups also left, and nobody seems to remember that they were a huge part of the landscape here
  • you have to take the eradication of sexual content from online spaces seriously as an issue that affects more than whether you personally can post catgirl balls on one specific platform
  • there is no 'good social media' in 2023 that will ever be equipped to solve this problem until the financial/cultural issue is addressed. decentralisation is your best bet. sorry.